DISCLOSURE: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases and may be paid a commission for any sales from links, buttons, or images clicked on this website.

Owon SDS1102 vs Hantek DSO5102P Comparison

If you’re looking for incredible oscilloscopes worth every bit of money invested, you’ll most likely encounter two models: the Owon SDS1102, and the Hantek DSO5102P.

Those two instruments are among the top of their kind. They’re affordable, and better yet, they don’t lose any quality in materials or performance. On the other hand, they’re capable of competing with the most expensive oscilloscopes and still put up a good fight.

Naturally, there’s no need to buy both. So, in today’s article, we’ll settle the Owon SDS1102 VS Hantek DSO5102P debate once and for all. Which one’s better for you? Continue reading to find out!

OWON SDS1102 VS HANTEK DSO5102P Comparison

Preview
Hantek DSO5102P 100MHz 2CH Digital Oscilloscope 1GSa/s Real-Time Sample
OWON SDS1102 Digital Desktop Oscilloscope 100 MHz Bandwidth 1 GSa/s Sample Rate 10K pts wavelength
Bandwidths
100MHz
100 MHz
Channel
2
2
Trigger Mode
edge/pulse width/line selectable video/slop/overtime etc.
Auto, Normal, Single
Trigger Type
Edge,Video,Pulse,Slope, Over time, Alternative
Edge, Video
Editor's Pick
Preview
Hantek DSO5102P 100MHz 2CH Digital Oscilloscope 1GSa/s Real-Time Sample
Bandwidths
100MHz
Channel
2
Trigger Mode
edge/pulse width/line selectable video/slop/overtime etc.
Trigger Type
Edge,Video,Pulse,Slope, Over time, Alternative
Preview
OWON SDS1102 Digital Desktop Oscilloscope 100 MHz Bandwidth 1 GSa/s Sample Rate 10K pts wavelength
Bandwidths
100 MHz
Channel
2
Trigger Mode
Auto, Normal, Single
Trigger Type
Edge, Video

Last update on 2024-11-01 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

1. Owon SDS1102

OWON SDS1102 Digital Desktop Oscilloscope 100 MHz Bandwidth 1 GSa/s Sample Rate 10K pts wavelength

This oscilloscope is a clear example of what an affordable instrument should be. Despite being available at a low price, the performance it puts up doesn’t disappoint. Here’s how it does it.

Design

With only 1.1 kg of weight, this instrument is a suitable pick for most people. It features a good-looking enclosure with barely any depth, allowing you to place it on most surfaces easily. At the back, you’ll find two foldable legs that make it possible to lean the oscilloscope a bit.

The connection to the main power supply is on the left side, which is an issue because it consumes a lot of space you could use for other tools.

To make the instrument work, you’ll need two probes, the power cable, and the USB, as those two components help establish a connection with the PC.

Display and Controls

This instrument has a 7-inch display with 800×480 pixels for the resolution. Both the brightness and the angle for viewing are incredible, similar to what you’d see in the more expensive oscilloscopes.

Right next to the display, you’ll find five buttons to control the menu. There’s also a multi-purpose rotary button, and one of its purposes is to scroll through sub-menus.

Although there’s no denying how well organized the operating panel is, some buttons are not in the most convenient place. Beginners won’t notice how odd that is, but people with experience using these instruments will certainly find the location of some of the buttons strange.

There’s something else that will come to your attention, and that’s the design of the rotary buttons. They’re all the same size, and far too similar to each other. That’s not a deal-breaker, but it’s still a noticeable flaw.

Specifications

The oscilloscope offers 2 channels, with a bandwidth power of 100MHz. For the sample rate, it delivers 1GS/.
Surprisingly, the specifications described above are standard for instruments available at a higher price.

That’s why the Owon SDS1102 oscilloscope is such a good pick; it performs equally as good as the most expensive models while being available at a lower price.

Check Latest Price

2. Hantek DSO5102P

Hantek DSO5102P 100MHz 2CH Digital Oscilloscope 1GSa/s Real-Time Sample

Next, we’ll discuss what could easily be every electrician’s best friend. Yes, the following product isn’t perfect, but its outstanding performance compensates for the few flaws it has.

Are you ready to find out more? Then let’s check out what the Hantek DSO5102P Oscilloscope has to offer.

Design

If we were discussing which the best-looking oscilloscope is, that discussion would end here. Once it arrives and you get to look at it closely, you’ll realize the incredible quality of both the materials and the build. Surely enough, the oscilloscope looks better than it does online!

The instrument works with power supply, two probes, and the USB cable for the PC. Additionally, there’s a CD included to install the software on your computer and control the scope from there.

This model weighs 7.1 pounds or 3.2 kg. It’s quite bulky, requiring more space to fit.

Display and Controls

The instrument features wide 7.0-inch color quality for the display. It’s incredible, as it allows you to analyze better the information displayed.

You can read data like the wave signals or navigate through the menus with complete ease. Adjusting the settings is pretty intuitive too.

It also helps a lot that the scope features every essential function you could expect. For instance, there’s the option to make either vertical or horizontal alignment, adjusting the scale, trigger, and many more.

Controlling any of those operations is not hard due to the many buttons included.
Even though everyone can use this oscilloscope, beginners would benefit the most from it. The user-friendly features, combined with incredible data display, help understand everything quickly.

Specifications

This oscilloscope offers two channels, working with 100MHz of bandwidth, and producing 1GSa/s. The performance put up by this instrument is remarkable, considering the price. Clear proof that you don’t need high-end tools to achieve your tasks successfully.

Check Latest Price

OWON SDS1102 Or HANTEK DSO5102P oscilloscope?

Having doubts which one to buy? No worries. Here, we’ll summarize it.

Design – Convenience above Everything

The Owon SDS1102 oscilloscope is more lightweight, and its build has less depth to consume less space.

However, the location of the input on the left side is not the best. On the other hand, the Hantek DSO5102P oscilloscope is heavier and bulkier.

As you can see, both instruments have a few flaws when it comes to their design.

Display and Control – Which Is More Friendly to Users?

Most people would love the Owon SDS1102 for its display organization and buttons, but Hantek DSO5102P does a better job by far.

Both the display quality and the buttons of the Hantek DSO5102P make using the oscilloscope a better experience.

The data provided is accurate, and you can change the settings to make adjustments quickly, thanks to the well-distributed buttons.

Specifications – Equally Efficient

Luckily, the specifications are fairly similar between these two oscilloscopes. If that was something that concerned you, then you shouldn’t have to worry about it anymore because they both offer similar performance.

The two instruments are dual-channel, they work with 100MHz of bandwidth, and produce a real-time sample of 1Gsa/s.

Conclusion

Realistically, it’s difficult to pick a winner between the Owon SDS1102 VS Hantek DSO5102P debate. While the first one is a few bucks more affordable, consumes less space, and is lighter, the design of the buttons could be better.

Then, we have the Hantek DSO5102P, which is a lot better for beginners. It’s not as convenient as the other model, but it’s easier to operate.

Ultimately, it’s your decision to pick one between the two oscilloscopes. Considering their similar specifications, you can focus on other features like aesthetics, display, and functionality, among other things.

1 thought on “Owon SDS1102 vs Hantek DSO5102P Comparison”

  1. You shouldn’t trust the specifications of these cheaper models – they often have huge allowances. Like “100MHz, but with amplitude reduced to half starting already from 50MHz” or “100MHz, but shared by all input channels”.
    So, to claim that these models are a viable competition for more expensive alternatives needs solid side-by-side testing, which, judging from the article, you haven’t done. You need to do stress-testing for upper limits and lower limits (noise) to make a reliable judgment.

    Reply

Leave a Comment